Events & Insights
|
April 27, 2026
Practical retina insights from Dr. Chhabra: when to monitor vs refer, common PVD & lattice cases, and key red flags you can’t miss.

Medical Retina Insights Dinner Summary

Featuring Dr. Mohit Chhabra

Medical Retina Insights Dinner Summary

Purpose of the Evening

Dr. Chhabra framed the session around everyday clinical decision-making in medical retina, with a focus on:

  • Common retinal findings seen in optometric practice
  • Practical referral decision-making (what needs to go, what can be monitored)
  • Reducing uncertainty in peripheral retinal findings
  • Strengthening communication between optometry and retina care teams
  • Using evolving imaging tools to support clinical judgement

A key theme introduced early was that while technology continues to evolve (OCT, Optos, in-office angiography), the fundamentals remain unchanged: careful examination, clinical context, and communication are still central to good care.

Practical, real-world retinal guidance for optometrists; what to monitor, when to refer, and how to confidently manage common posterior segment findings.

Key Clinical Themes

1. Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD): Common but Requires Context

PVDs were discussed as one of the most frequently encountered findings.

Key takeaways included:

  • Asymptomatic PVDs with no pathology generally do not require follow-up
  • Symptomatic PVDs without tears can typically be followed in 6–8 weeks
  • PVD with vitreous hemorrhage should raise suspicion for an underlying tear
  • Significant hemorrhage often warrants a closer look for hidden retinal breaks
  • Patient education is essential so new symptoms are reported immediately
  • Thorough documentation of findings is critical

The overall message: most PVDs are benign, but symptoms and associated findings determine risk.

2. Lattice Degeneration: Common, Often Over-Managed

Lattice degeneration was highlighted as a frequent source of referral uncertainty.

Key points included:

  • Present in ~5–10% of the population
  • Only a small percentage progress to retinal detachment (~1%)
  • Management depends heavily on context, not appearance alone

Dr. Chhabra emphasized a simple checklist approach:

  • Is the patient symptomatic?
  • Any history of retinal detachment (patient or family)?
  • Is this truly lattice (not mimics like cobblestone degeneration)?
  • Are there holes, tears, or traction present?
  • Is there pigmentation suggesting chronicity?

Management principles:

  • Asymptomatic, stable lattice → monitor
  • Symptomatic or uncertain cases → refer
  • Laser is not always required and can sometimes increase traction risk

The key idea: not all lattice needs intervention, and over-treatment can occasionally create complications.

3. Retinal Tears & Detachments: Refer First, Decide Later

Retinal tears were positioned as straightforward from a workflow perspective:

  • Any confirmed tear → refer
  • Same-day referral depends on symptom timing (acute vs longstanding)
  • Risk factors include high myopia, trauma, prior surgery, aphakia/pseudophakia

A recurring message:

“If there’s a tear, send it. Decision-making can be left to retina.”

For retinal detachments:

  • Mac-on detachments: urgent (same/next day)
  • Mac-off detachments: urgent but slightly less time-sensitive
  • Chronic detachments: not emergent but still require repair

4. Peripheral Lesions: Avoiding Diagnostic Confusion

Several peripheral lesions were reviewed as common “mimickers”:

  • CHRPE (generally benign, often incidental)
  • Multifocal “bear track” CHRPE → requires GI referral for polyposis screening
  • Choroidal nevus → monitor for change in size or elevation

The emphasis here was on pattern recognition and not overreacting to benign lesions, while still being alert to systemic associations when patterns are atypical.

5. Uveitis: Don’t Start Steroids Prematurely

Uveitis was highlighted as an area where early referral is preferred over immediate treatment initiation.

Key messages:

  • Avoid starting steroids before full evaluation when possible
  • Posterior uveitis especially requires systemic workup
  • Infectious or malignant causes must be ruled out in older patients
  • A structured systemic history is essential before treatment

6. Imaging, AI & Communication: The Future Is Collaborative

Dr. Chhabra closed the clinical portion by emphasizing:

  • Imaging quality and accessibility are improving rapidly
  • Platforms like Care1 are enhancing communication between providers
  • AI tools will increasingly support, but not replace, clinical judgment
  • The most important clinical tool remains: communication

His recurring message:

“When in doubt, just call.”

Collaborate with specialists and
harness AI insights through Care1

✔ Deliver the highest standard of care
✔ Increase patient satisfaction and retain patients
✔ Stimulate revenue

Key Takeaways

  • Most retinal findings are managed based on context, not appearance alone
  • PVDs and lattice degeneration are common but often over-escalated
  • Retinal tears and detachments should be referred without hesitation
  • Patient education and documentation are as important as diagnosis
  • Over-treatment (especially laser) can sometimes introduce risk
  • Collaboration between optometry and retina care is essential
  • Communication remains the strongest clinical safeguard

Notable Insights

  • “Early recognition and appropriate referral are the biggest drivers of improved outcomes in retinal disease.”
  • “Confident clinical decisions come from context-based assessment, not just how a lesion appears.”

When it comes to retina care, small decisions early on can have lasting impact and having a team you can easily connect with makes all the difference.

— The Care1 Team

Read More